Labour – the voting closes.

In a few hours time, the ballot closes in the Labour leadership election, and by the same time on Saturday the new leader will be announced. Whoever it turns out to be, I hope that the party – especially the Parliamentary Labour Party – gets behind the new leader.

The views in this post are mine, and mine alone; I do not speak for The Grim Squeaker himself or this blog.

I have voted for Corbyn – this is hardly a secret to anyone who knows me! I do not necessarily agree with all his ideas; but I think his detractors have exaggerated his unsuitability for a leadership role, and have chosen to make a lot of fuss about his history rather than focus on what he is saying now.

It has bothered me that, despite the original support for Ed Miliband’s ideas on reforming the voting system, as soon as it became possible that Corbyn might steal a march on his so-called moderate fellow candidates, the Labour heirarchy started muttering about entryism. As a fairly recent member, who joined shortly after Ed Miliband’s statesmanlike handling of the Syria debate in 2013, some who have supported Labour for decades might argue that I am an entryist – but I know people of the left who think Blair was the ultimate entryist, so we all have our views on this and those views are equally valid.

The NEC agreed to implement the voting reforms of the Collins Review – them’s the rules, as agreed, so all the full members, the affiliates, and the registered supporters, ARE the Labour Party now. It’s no use moaning now, it’s too late to claim it’s not fair – and if long term members are affronted by what they feel is not a proper vote because they don’t like the idea of new members potentially delivering a result they don’t want, I would respectfully suggest that they had some time to argue against the Collins Review as it was agreed in principle by the NEC in February 2014 subject to a vote at the Special Conference on 1st. March 2014.

Maybe the law of unintended consequences applies; but this system is what the party voted for and this system is what it’s got. If Corbyn does win (and as I write, that is not a certainty) anything could happen. I hope that he is supported by all sections/factions of the party; I hope they do not stage a coup or do any other thing that gives the Tories – especially Osborne – a chance to attack Labour any more than they do already.

Whoever wins will be under scrutiny by the Tories and their media friends – Ed Miliband was attacked for having 2 kitchens (Cameron has 5, not including his official residences); he was attacked for making a mess of eating a bacon sandwich (Cameron eats hot dogs with a knife and fork); he was “Red Ed”, he was weird, he was a geek/wonk/whatever……and he was “funny looking”. Kendall will be attacked for being more Tory than the Tories, however untrue; Burnham will be attacked for Mid-Staffs, however untrue; Cooper will be attacked for being married to Balls and for Atos and for flipping houses (sadly all too true); Corbyn will be attacked for pretty much everything; and all that will obscure the fight that they will try to take to the Tories.

And that’s the point – none of the candidates is the enemy of the left, none of the candidates wants to see another 5 years of Tory hegemony after this current term, and even though I personally have problems with the ABC candidates (mainly because their campaigns have been so poor and they have failed to persuade me to change my mind) these shenanigans over the leadership have blinded some of us to who the real enemy is.

Whoever wins, I want Labour to deliver a strong and principled oppositon; we Brits are not usually given to extreme politics – but unless we fight the Tories and their corporate takeover of all I hold dear, we could end up with the sort of fractured politics we see in parts of Europe. I don’t want a Golden Dawn in the UK – UKIP is bad enough. I don’t want a Militant-loony-left type left wing either.

But I do think that the time has come for a real fight against the corporations that control our media, politics, and public services; I think the time has gone for a slightly less obvious touchy-feely New Labour type of capitalism. Mandelson once said he was intensely relaxed about the filthy rich – as long as they pay their taxes. Well, they don’t. That ship has sailed.

I hope the old guard in Labour – MPs, long-term members, affiliates, new supporters, everyone – will support the new leader and give them the heft they will need to oppose effectively. If they can’t or won’t, I fear for our future.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Labour – the voting closes.”

  1. The new voting system has proved the ultimate irony. It was designed to get rid of the influence of the Unions who were generally, but not universally, left of New Labour. They replaced it with a system that means they have lost control of the (left) vote totally!!! One has to assume that they thought it would favour New Labour……….that’s the only reason they would have changed, as we have seen in some of the grubby behind the scenes machinations it really wasn’t about a wider democracy.

    Well, it’s after 12 now, so there’s no going back now. Is there?

    Like

    1. It’s interesting, isn’t it?

      I hope you are right, and there’s no going back…..well, for now.

      If whoever wins has good support from the longer-term members (and my understanding is that the vote breakdown will be made public) then all the accusations of entryism by the new supporters can be put to bed.

      If they don’t, then I think we can expect at least some of the usual suspects (Mann, Danzcuk) to want to challenge the result.

      Like

  2. 1.All legitimate votes are equal,I have no truck with their value based somehow on length of membership,it is not a loyalty card affair and we should be encouraging increased involvement.
    2.We should accept the result and take aim towards the real target.
    3.It has gone on too long
    4.There has been many balls up and a bit of a shambles.
    5.We disagree on the most effective method of opposition
    6.We disagree on choice of leader
    7.I disagree and ever have on many things that the Labour Party has done/proposes.
    8.I stay because they are the only hope and do differ,despite what those with another agenda relentlessly propagandise,from the Tories .

    Like

  3. I made no secret of the fact that Burnham had my first preference vote but, as Corbyn had my second (and only other) preference I am more than happy with this result as Kendall or Cooper would have been a disaster.

    Can’t say I am as happy with the deputy leadership going to Tom Watson however. This was a man who regularly briefed against Miliband, was indeed as reliable a rentagob as the loathsome Danczuk. I think it can be argued that he cost a good many votes in marginal seats, casting some of his colleagues (and his Party) into the wilderness; the fact that his initial speech revolved around the need for unity within the Labour Party finished off my already stuttering Ironymeter. I opined (not least to Watson himself, hence him blocking me on Twitter) that he seemed more concerned with his own advancement that with the cause of the Party; it seems, yet again, that I was correct.

    Like

    1. It’s good that Burnham has a senior role – though I still wish he’d been given Health (despite the risk of the Tories accusing him for Mid-Staffs) because his ideas on health and social care are pretty good. I agree with you about Kendall and Cooper.

      I was torn between Eagle and Watson – but I had the suspicion Eagle would have got something good (as it is she’s both BIS and the deputy PM equivalent) and Watson is good on digital engagement and media. Yes, he is a rentagob and he is ambitious; but his work on Murdoch and CSA is impressive and I think – as long as he’s loyal, which is a gamble – he could be OK. None of the others were much good IMHO.

      We’ll see, won’t we? What matters most now is that we take the fight to the real enemy. The Tories will stop at nothing to discredit Labour, and it’s going to be a battle to keep the anti-austerity agenda in their faces. There is a lot of public support for some of the cuts (especially to benefits) so there’s a lot of work to do.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s